This issue analyses the merits and achievements of the Good Friday Agreement, as well as the problems which have arisen since its signing. Some of the authors in this second issue of RISE explore the insufficiencies of the consociational nature of the settlement, the (effective) depoliticisatisation of the state’s role, and the imposition of a singular, inflexible ‘roadmap’ towards peace; they reveal and critique contradictions and silences in key areas of governmental policy. At the same time, the role and treatment of victims and survivors in post-conflict Northern Ireland is analysed, as well as the roles given to and taken by museums in addressing the legacy of conflict and contributing to reconciliation in Northern Irish society. Many of the authors look closely at cultural responses to the Agreement, particularly those which unearth lacunae in its underlying assumptions and projected policies. The areas covered in these essays—politics; history; gender studies; museum culture; literary and visual culture; policy making —are as diverse as the opinions and stances towards the Agreement’s aims and efficacy, but they are united in offering reflections on how better to promote peace and stability in Northern Ireland.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32803/rise.v1i2
Published: 2017-03-10